Search for: "Head v State" Results 1561 - 1580 of 14,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 9:31 am
However, there is a lingering concern that State legislators, having already raided the tobacco trust fund to meet State budget shortfalls, would be tempted to do the same with Court trust funds. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am by INFORRM
On 13 July, Sir Anthony May, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Blair handed down their judgment in R (Gaunt) v Ofcom. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
Two weeks later, months of conflict came to a head in United States v. al-Nashiri as the military judge overseeing the matter, Col. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Larry
Customs examined the factors set out in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:45 pm
" Real Alaskans know that, while there is an official First Dude of the State, there is no Secretary of State. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2006 the applicant company published an article on the Delfi portal under the heading “SLK Destroyed Planned Ice Road”. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in Magnus v Sklover ; 2012 NY Slip Op 03415 ; Decided on May 1, 2012 ; Appellate Division, Second Department Justice Lefkowitz in Supreme Court, Westchester County denied defendants three-headed motion to dismiss. [read post]