Search for: "In re Sullivan " Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2009, 12:13 pm
Her examples: In re Wiggins, a 2001 Idaho case involving Peachtree Settlement Funding, and the Fresno County cases involving 321 Henderson (a J.G. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(I know, I know, you’re thinking ‘This whole book is a digression. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
The hearings “have been riveting to watch—and even more remarkably, they have captured the daily news cycle again and again,” wrote Washington Post media columnist Margaret Sullivan after the committee wrapped up its public work for the summer. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
It provided an in-depth discussion of California’s leading case on military pension shifting, In re Marriage of Krempin (1999) 70 CA4th 1008, and its dissection of the majority rule (22 states, including California, allowing for some equitable remedy to the non-military spouse in the form of support reassessment or redistribution of martial property) and minority rule (5 states allowing for no remedy) nationwide. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
Last month, for example, we shared with you the internal interview manual that Sullivan & Cromwell provides to its attorneys who conduct on-campus interviews at law schools.Today, in a similar spirit, we take an inside look at the annual review process for attorneys at Skadden Arps. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by Sandy Levinson
Many leading figures have written on it--Richard Epstein, Kathleen Sullivan, Seth Kreimer, and Mitch Berman, for starters--and I think it's fair to say that none has carried the day. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:43 am by SHG
It’s not as if anyone would respond to their claims with, “cut the crap, you’re putting on a show to pretend you’re traumatized by nothing because you believe that’s what you’re supposed to feel if you’re woke. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 5:43 pm
My clients (Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk, Sherman & Sterling to name a few) have built this out as well. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:42 pm
If it reaches levels approaching that of the Intifada, we're in deep trouble. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
"You're welcome, but we believe that we're obliged to provide legal help to people who would not otherwise have it. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:35 am by David Post
" Dan Sullivan, Alaska "Our country is very split and we are in the midst of a highly contested presidential election. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Australia In Yu, Re [2013] QSC 322, the High Court of Queensland gave probate to a will contained in the iPad of the deceased Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
Below we have presented some useful statistics that shed greater light on who's blogging, how much of it they're doing and other trends of law blogs today. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 8:36 pm by law shucks
One new addition to the market is Sullivan & Cromwell in London. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm by David Lat
It seems like we’re only “market” when we need to hire lateral talent; otherwise, we’re happy to pay below market, yet take steps to make it appear as if we’re still market. [read post]