Search for: "Juri v. Juri"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 46,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 2:00 am
Bowers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:50 am
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm
Supreme Court opinions involving race and the jury invariably open with the Fourteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, or landmark cases like Strauder v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm
Supreme Court opinions involving race and the jury invariably open with the Fourteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, or landmark cases like Strauder v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Baugh v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm
Crossing the Line in Voir Dire The Utah Court of Appeals rendered an opinion in State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:23 am
As reported by yesterday's Oregonian, the complaint (full text) in Griffin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:04 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In his 19-page Memorandum of Decision in Gordon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Regina v Carter (David) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division “If a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage in the trial, the judge was not required to direct the remaining members of the jury to ignore any views expressed by the juror who had departed. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:44 am
Regina v S(K) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) "A judge should not continue to try a case alone after discharging the jury because of jury tampering where an informed objective bystander might legitimately conclude that there was a real possibility of bias by the judge. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29 “Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
It arises in a criminal case where the defendant was accused of making threats relating to his employment with the Post Office.The case is United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
And the Justices of the United States Supreme Court, in Gideon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:43 pm
While many people believe that attorneys especially prosecutors strike potential jurors because of race, which violates Batson v Kentucky, proving such conduct has been historically difficult. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:17 am
The Atlantic has a good article on Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
In Rankin v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 12:25 pm
Attorneys who violate the “Golden Rule” when providing a closing summation to a jury at trial risk losing a verdict for their clients, so says the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division in Morgan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
I'll post more details later, but I just learned that the Marshall jury in Judge Davis' Mass v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:15 am
The post ASHTON S. v. [read post]
