Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 1561 - 1580 of 6,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by Christine Corcos
Without relinquishing his faith in the law, Dunbar used prose narratives to expose the disjuncture between law and justice made manifest by the US Supreme Court’s rationalization of racial discrimination in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
Without relinquishing his faith in the law, Dunbar used prose narratives to expose the disjuncture between law and justice made manifest by the US Supreme Court’s rationalization of racial discrimination in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am by Daniel Hemel
The issue came to a head again 60 years later in Davis v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 4:48 am by SHG
Under the Supreme Court’s 1999 decision in Davis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
’s exercise of its right to purchase the petitioners’ shares pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1118 is that it is untimely. [read post]