Search for: "LONG v. HARRIS"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Brinker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:04 pm
Harris.) [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:35 am
Of course, we were already in the throes of affirmative-action backlash and judicial retrenchment; colorblind constitutionalism was shaped before our very eyes; and even as a law student I had studied Harris v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:27 am
The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm
It's not that long. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 9:01 pm
Harris, 347 U.S. 612, 617 (1954). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
96-1040. -- October 21, 1998 Considered by HARRIS, P.J., and LARSON, LAVORATO, NEUMAN, and ANDREASEN,JJ. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:42 am
But compare this to the reaction in New Orleans, where the argument coming from Harry Connick's office, and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am
Titles V & VI These titles increase the number of shareholders a private company may have and still remain private. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:55 pm
(See Harris v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Harris, Book Note, Reviewing Roger I. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:35 am
A related case on behalf of Otis (Damon) Harris is captioned Harris v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:00 am
"Harris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
So, Connick v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
