Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
The under secretary of defense for policy, John C. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
; andCan it constitute bad faith to apply to register a trade mark without any intention to use it in relation to the specified goods and services? [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:23 am
For example, over 20kg of hemp is contained in a Mercedes Benz C class motor vehicle. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Trademark rights allow (a) the owner the right to build goodwill with the mark and (b) consumer identification of goods and services from a particular source. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:39 am
[C]onsumers are used to seeing the term RAINFOREST in connection with dietary and nutritional supplements, whether it is used as a trademark or descriptively/suggestively, and Applicant’s mark will thus be perceived as just one more of the many uses of RAINFOREST/RAIN FOREST for dietary or nutritional supplements or related goods. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
The problem with this plan, however, is that Sections 3(1)(b) and (c) of the UK’s Trade Marks Act 1994 forbid the registration of “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” and “trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the . . . geographical origin . . . of goods or services. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
” The correct standard, as applied by the PTO, is that a suggestive mark requires imagination to link with the goods/services, knowing the goods/services. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
Tucker (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 1163, 1170, internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:15 am
Dan Burk and Mark Lemley have argued [here]. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:26 am
In conclusion, art. 1.C runs against the exhaustion rule and is therefore void. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
This deference reached a high water mark in the late 1990s. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
App. 246, 255, 593 S.E.2d 87, 92 (2004) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
The trial court also found: “Wife is an interested party acting in good faith with insufficient means to defray costs and expenses of suit and is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
The Honorable Paul C. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
C. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
Arnold agreed that this was beyond dispute that each of the Target Websites were using signs identical to the Trade Marks in the course of trade in relation to goods identical to those for which the Trade Marks are registered without consent. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 10:53 am
appeared first on The Law Offices of Mark Sherman. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 12:00 am
This, in a nutshell, is the subject of the referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cooper, C-622/18. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
(ii) the similarity of the marks and whether the defendant’s mark draws a clear distinction as a competing brand.... [read post]
