Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 61,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
” The Obligation of State Parties to the Genocide Convention to Prevent Atrocities The International Court of Justice ruled in February 2007 in the case Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 3:23 pm
Specifically, they stated that their plan was a private plan under a test set out in Alley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
There is some case law, such as Mondev v United States, to support the theory that the standard may be an evolving one. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
”[1] Which pretty succinctly states the main point of this entire series of blog posts: that human agency matters. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
So what will that mean in Wisconsin? [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:13 pm
§ 1500’s jurisdictional bar and deviated from settled precedent when it construed this Court’s straightforward “substantially the same operative facts” standard, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992); Printz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
HELD- All three appeals dismissed The Unduly Harsh Test The meaning of the unduly harsh test was previously considered by the Supreme Court in KO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 53, which the Secretary of State submitted the Court of Appeal failed to follow in HA/RA. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 2:35 pm
The post Justice Sotomayor Needs To Re-Read <i>Marbury v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:20 am
I previously wrote that I was hoping the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Notably the applicants were not intermediaries within the meaning of the statute that had been adopted to transpose the e-commerce Directive. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court has recently heard arguments in the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court has recently heard arguments in the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court has recently heard arguments in the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:58 am
., v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:07 am
Mullins v. [read post]
