Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
"On Additional Hour of Pay" under California Labor Code Section 226.7 Constitutes Wage or Premium Pay Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations Period, not a Penalty Subject to One-Year Limitations Period, California Supreme Court Holds In a case that will have a substantial and immediate impact on labor law class action cases, the California Supreme Court today issued its long-awaited decision in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:41 pm
Environmental Regulation, 58 EMORY L.J. 379 (2008) Lisa Heinzerling, Thrower Keynote Address: The Role of Science in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:10 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
National Prosecution of International Crimes: Cases and LegislationJames Yap, Corporate Civil Liability for War Crimes in Canadian Courts: Lessons from Bil'in (Village Council) v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:51 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Millemann of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak in the firm's IP Law Blog State found liable for beating on UT campus - Tennessee lawyer John Day of Day & Blair in his blog, Day on Torts ESOPs and company stock matches to 401(k): the Bear Stearns lesson - Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in the firm's Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog Government reply briefly field with Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
Murphy, Constitutional Democracy (2006)Keith E. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:36 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    Plaintiff Spoliates Self And Her Case Dismissed from Epstein Becker & Green: EBG delves into Mangione v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 10:07 am
California jury rejects tippling speeder's lawsuit against landowner, automaker, town, etc. in the case we headlined "Shouldn't Have Put Its Berm Where He Wanted To Skid" [Dec. 24, 2005; Douglas Domel v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:43 am by Curt Cutting
” The plaintiff will probably appeal, arguing that the 10-to-1 ratio is too low and relying on the statement in State Farm v. [read post]