Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2021, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
” NY TimesTop 10 Nonprofit Tweets: HistPhil: What does the recent Supreme Court ruling, Americans For Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:52 pm
Co.of N.Y., 10 NY3d at 193).As the Court of Appeals found in Bi-Economy Mkt., Inc. v Harleysville Ins. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  It is unlikely that Iowa would probably accept that argument, however, based upon the decisions of the North Dakota Supreme Court in the case of In the Interest of A.B.[23] and the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[24]. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
In addition to the three constitutional standing requirements, `the Supreme Court has held that prudential requirements pose additional limitations o [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v Cuomo (2020), the Supreme Court of the United States determined that an executive order that imposed restrictions on attendance at religious services in certain areas in response to the COVID-19 pandemic would likely not be considered neutral and of general applicability and thus must satisfy strict scrutiny. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Postiglione v Sacks & Sacks, LLP  2022 NY Slip Op 30148(U) January 19, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 513779/19 Judge: Karen B. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:22 pm
Emery World Wide Delivery Corp., 93 N.Y.2d 554, 693 N.Y.S.2d 493, 715 N.E.2d 495 (1999), the Court of Appeals highlighted the differences, in distinguishing Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388(1), which imposes liability on all vehicle owners for accidents resulting from negligence in the permissive use or operation of their vehicles, with the No–Fault Law. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Supreme Court decided four Indian law cases that year. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Supreme Court held that California Governor Gavin Newsom may not continue the ban on indoor religious services to limit the spread of the coronavirus. [read post]