Search for: "PERSON v. STATE"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 84,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
That is, the entire record is open for review ( State Comp. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
In VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (C-340/21), the CJEU concluded that individuals may have suffered “non-material damage”—and therefore be able to claim compensation—if they can demonstrate that they feared future misuse of personal data that was compromised in a personal data breach. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court’s Muldrow v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:24 am
In Tysiac v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
Heijmen v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
" Grae v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
See Egbert v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Notwithstanding, it is important for organs of state to be aware that the date upon which a debt becomes due is not necessarily the day that the cause of action occurs, as the court may consider the claimant’s personal circumstances and access to legal representation. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:53 am
SJB RE Holdings, LLC v Gifford 2024 NY Slip Op 30924(U) March 21, 2024Supreme Court, Saratoga County Docket Number: Index No. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Internal policies regarding the sharing of such data with the state should be updated. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am
Retro-KatsThere are still places available for the fifth annual Retromark conference, which returns for another afternoon of in-person trade mark law and practice hosted by Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat on Tuesday 7 May. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
