Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 11:06 am
Okay to "repeal" Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:58 pm
The Indian law of torts is based on the principles of Common Law as iterated in Rajkot Municipal Corpn. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The task for the drafter of the code is to make sense of all of this, taking account of the law as it had developed in and after the House of Lords decision in Ahmad v Newham LBC (links to our note), as well as the policy desire since the days of Caroline Flint as housing minister to "reward" those in or seeking employment through allocations priorities. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
The incarnation of the people of England (represented as was customary for the time by its classes―king, lords temporal and spiritual, and commons) would have viewed an unconstrained common law as constraining its ability to “make” law, that is to use the power of commanding behavior instrumentally. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
A chaotic or open border makes it impossible to screen out people who really do very urgently need to be screened out. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:07 pm
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment Bath and North East Somerset Council v the mother & Ors [2017] EWFC B10 (27 February 2017) An ‘ordinary’ case in the family court described by HHJ Wildblood as showing the truly pitiful plight of a mother caught up in drug addiction. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
@legalbizzle on his blog writes:The Angry Pencil: a pathology of customer complaints “There are people who can’t let a bandwagon go unjumped on. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
Briefly, in the matter of M.A. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
Harm is thus equated with people changing their opinion about a telecommunications project. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
There are no people in front of the defendants' bus. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
There are cases where Singapore do vary including the application of the law of passing off as applied in the House of Lords case of Scandecor. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
[See James Lee Clark v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am
It is due to be debated in the House of Lords today. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
However, he managed to win his fair share of the legal arguments and even appeared successfully before the Supreme Court [ed. note: Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:27 pm
Reprieve immediately requested the decision be reversed, citing the US Supreme Court’s ongoing consideration of a related case, Kiyemba v Obama (Kiyemba II), in which it was decided that US courts could not prevent the Obama Administration from forcibly repatriating prisoners to countries where they face persecution. [read post]
