Search for: "People v Peters" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
I am not sure how many people actually have the long view over time, or the wider view internationally. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
 He has previously blogged for HR in I on his work with the Texas Defender Service, which represents people on death row. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am by Rachit Buch
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
The certainly-Irish-Canadian Peter Ryan has all the details. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Sources [1] Bikram’s Yoga Coll. of India, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
 More broadly, this is a version of the very old point (for which Peter Westen's classic article, The Empty Idea of Equality, is usually cited), that most of the work in the requirement that similarly situated people be treated similarly is done by figuring out what counts as similar. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:31 am by tekEditor
Some people don't like Lisp syntax, but it has several major technical advantages over its competitors. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Peter Jaszi: WIPO’s greatest failing may be in its educational activities, heavily weigh [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
(In two later applications, RM v UK (no. 29080/22) and HN v UK (no. 29084/22)), the Court also decided to apply an interim measure under Rule 39 staying their removal.) [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  To add to these difficulties, people are living longer, which means they need their retirement income to last longer. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]