Search for: "People v. Saling"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 5,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
In its 2013 decision in Capitol Records v ReDigi [noted here and here] the US District Court for the Southern District of New York held that the first sale defence (the EU doctrine of exhaustion was derived from US first sale doctrine) is limited to material items. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
’” Id. at *8 (quoting Unites States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am
Janus v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:07 am
Crossfit, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:36 pm
SEC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:04 pm
People v. [read post]
Facebook "Sponsored Stories" Publicity Rights Lawsuit Survives Motion to Dismiss--Fraley v. Facebook
19 Dec 2011, 9:10 am
By Eric Goldman Fraley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:42 am
This program is limited to 15 people. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
And as to the acts punished under § 11352, the panel said that in People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:40 am
” [10] See U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Rooks thought [Krzewski] had a `good sales personality,’ and invited him to apply for a sales position with Parkland Realty. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The Trump administration outlawed bump stocks after a 2017 shooting in Las Vegas where the rapid-fire accessory was used to kill 58 people. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 5:55 am
(Pacelli v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
The Act provides immunities and defenses for legitimate “patients” and “caregivers”, but pecuniary schemes like the one at issue in this casenote are clearly not protected by the MMMA.Compassionate Apothecary, a medical marijuana dispensary, or “provisioning center”, was the business model that underwent recent scrutiny by the Michigan Supreme Court in People v McQueen. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
Nordstrom, Inc. v. 7525419 Canada Inc., No. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:13 pm
TransCanada Hydro Northeast v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
Artists have legitimate reasons to use existing images beyond just to parody them or comment directly upon them and Cariou v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
Fraternity Collection, LLC v. [read post]
