Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Because it's filed by a food defendant, the petition naturally targets the disconnect between the "state" enforcement allowed by §337(b) and the "private attorney general" action permitted by the California Supreme Court.But §337(a) is lurking through out. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 3:02 pm
See blog here, discussing United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Webb, No. 065775 In conviction for murder and related charges, denial of writ of habeas corpus is reversed where petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated at trial and on appeal due to the actual conflict of interest his attorney labored under. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Edelen, No. 07-1189 Appeal of sentence for 126 months' imprisonment for one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base is dismissed where the appellate waiver, waiving defendant's right to file a direct appeal so long as the sentence imposed was within the applicable Guideline Sentencing Range or lower, was enforceable and valid. . [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
In a joint letter to the Texas Governor, Rick Perry, on 17 June 2008, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and US Attorney General Michael Mukasey called on Texas to take the "steps necessary to give effect to the Avena decision". [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
Without preemption, however, state juries are asked to do just that. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Since that time almost every major military ally of the United States has revised its policy to allow openly-gay service members, but the political will to change the policy in this country has been lacking. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:21 pm
What a district court giveth in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:58 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983). [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
