Search for: "Rhodes v. Rhodes" Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The language is taken directly — word for word — from last May’s Supreme Court opinion for Global-Tech Appliances v. [read post]
., Illinois, Indiana, Rhode Island), and New York expressly permits tax FCA claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 A: HS schoolers in Rhode Island must do an independent learning project. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It is justified in response to decisions like Trump v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers OCR Requires Rhode Island DHS To Provide Translation, Other Services For Limited English, Other Language Impaired Accommodations About Solutions Law Press Solutions Law Press™ provides business risk management, legal compliance, management effectiveness and other resources, training and education on human resources, employee benefits, compensation, data security and privacy, health care, insurance, and other key compliance, risk management, internal controls and other key… [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The UK Supreme Court held in Rhodes that the author of a book owes no duty to avoid causing distress to a potential reader of the book. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The UK Supreme Court held in Rhodes that the author of a book owes no duty to avoid causing distress to a potential reader of the book. [read post]