Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 1561 - 1580 of 6,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 10:16 am by Marilyn Wesel
District Court of the Western District of Missouri, former state Rep Rocky Miller and General Assembly employee John La Vanchy prevailed in Miller v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In determining habitual residence, it stated that the focus is upon the situation of the child; the intentions of the parents being merely one of the relevant factors. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Lyle Denniston
All cases during the February-March sitting will be in the morning sessions, which start at 10 a.m. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:42 pm
The Florida Legislature passes the laws/statutes of the State of Florida, and Florida's Supreme Court adopts Rules of Procedure, including the Family Law Rules of Procedure, which are binding rules and must be followed also. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:23 am by Meg Martin
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Jill E. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 6:31 am
Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:29 pm by Jeff Foust
The US Court of Federal Claims issued an order today formally lifting the injunction on payments to and from NPO Energomash for RD-180 engines used by United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rocket. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Leonard, LEONARD LAW.Transworld Systems Incorporated, Defendant, represented by Damian Patrick Richard, SESSIONS FISHMAN NATHAN & ISRAEL, LLP.Patenaude and Felix, APC & Matthew Cheung, Defendants, represented by Marc Rosenberg, LEE SMART PS INC.ORDERJOHN C. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:55 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court dismissed this argument and found that the reasoning in Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir [2015] UKSC 23 applies to this case, in that the unlawful acts or dishonest state of mind of a director cannot be attributed to the company to establish an illegality defence defeating the company’s claim under a constructive trust. [read post]