Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 7,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
On February 27, 2013, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
Unfortunately, Justice Kennedy did not feel that an accurate decision could be made at the hearing on Wednesday. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
EPA published the Endangerment Finding in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
The result in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm
Dunleavy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:39 pm
On June 20, 2016, the Supreme Court decided RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:06 am
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
, and Justice Kennedy. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:16 am
Disqualifying an individual who has intentionally made a false statement of any material fact in his or her application for public employment United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
The case is Jesner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
The case is Jesner v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:17 am
Plaintiff Kennedy Associates appealed. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
”What was the basis for Justice Kennedy’s concern? [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:01 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
"Nevertheless, I think it is safe to assume Justice Kennedy is, in fact, concerned about any holding of the Court that would imply a plenary power of Congress to require someone to affirmatively engage in a commercial transaction with a nonstate actor. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
Justice Kennedy announced the second opinion of the day, in Florence v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
In his dissent in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
