Search for: "SULLIVAN V. SULLIVAN" Results 1561 - 1580 of 4,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am by Ngai Zhang
Although there are certain exceptions, such as one where the government may require disclosure of such information pursuant to a criminal investigation, California’s First District Court of Appeal in Facebook v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Over at the Post, Kevin Sullivan has a five-part series on life under ISIS rule. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am by Amy Howe
”  And Amy Sullivan of Yahoo! [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm by S. Donnelly
Seminar topics include: Trends in tribal courts Negotiating contracts with tribes and tribal entities Dollar General Corporation v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
We did not grant Kim Davis any rights to use 'My Tune -The Eye Of The Tiger" wrote Survivor frontman Frankie Sullivan on the band's Facebook page. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove "actual malice" to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:01 am by Lee E. Berlik
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove “actual malice” to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Ann Althouse] Citing First Amendment, federal court enjoins FDA from prohibiting truthful speech by drugmakers about off-label uses [WSJ, Alex Tabarrok (in recent years, federal government “has extracted billions of dollars in settlements from pharmaceutical firms for engaging in what appears to be constitutionally protected speech”), Beck and Sullivan, Drug & Device Law on Amarin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]