Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
” Levine v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:34 am
") AC35418 - State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:12 pm
Class Action Complaint Against Credit Reporting Agencies Alleging State Law Claims Arising from Sale of “Trigger Leads” to Mortgage Lenders Properly Dismissed because Class Action Claims were Preempted by Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Second Circuit Holds Plaintiff, a mortgage lender, filed a putative class action against various consumer reporting agencies, including Equifax, Trans Union and Experian, alleging various state-law claims based on… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:07 pm
Under Omega v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
Cohen, supra, 37 Cal.4th 1048 (see Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
In Boys Market Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:42 pm
See, e.g., Klay v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
The Court's 7-2 decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Loeffler v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
As California wage and hour lawyers we read with interest the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
Eighth Circuit Finds That Two Nearly Simultaneous Drug Sales Are One Offense for Sentencing Purposes
10 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:55 am
The CAFC case of Jang v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:42 am
—A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public publicly disclosed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, provided that no act of patenting, publication, use, sale, commercialization, or any other act, shall constitute prior art with respect to this section, except to the extent the act results in a… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 11:00 am
The European Court of Justice (see judgment in Case C-47/09 Commission v Italian Republic) finds that Italy has failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law concerning the labelling of cocoa and chocolate products which harmonises the sales names for such products (see Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
In some states, e.g., North Carolina, see Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:10 am
In the case styled as the Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
