Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 3,714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2021, 5:55 am
In dicta, Apfel addressed pre-disclosure agreements, stating that novelty “at least to the buyer” is necessary for a seller to prove ownership of an idea. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:57 am
In Aldana v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 4:47 pm
The contract contained a rider with an "attorney approval contingency" stating as follows: "This Contract is contingent upon approval by attorneys for Seller and Purchaser by the third business day following each party's attorney's receipt of a copy of the fully executed Contract (the "Approval Period"). . . . [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm
” The change was made to ensure that if “The seller agrees to a buyer’s offer that includes Rider V, the seller is now aware that the buyer’s offer is contingent on the buyer selling another property. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Federal prosecutors on Friday filed a motion to amend their forfeiture complaint in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:22 am
” He stated that “there’s an inconsistency there. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:48 am
Hayes v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
Bassen WESTCHESTER COUNTYContracts Buyer Granted Judgment, Awarded Return of Money Paid for Extended Warranty Sold by Seller Vey v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
Thus, for example, in Thompson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
” * Kassa v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Roederer keeps its bottle while Cava loses its sparkleRoederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:52 pm
Steve reports the answer to that very question in the recently reported Illinois Appellate Court decision, Fox v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:49 pm
” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:35 pm
” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:49 pm
” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:41 pm
LaSalle Owner, LLC v. 180 N. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Pretka v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:10 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.Parts of the recent controversial ruling in SEC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
Boyd County Board of Education, 08-701). ** Whether the sale of an item on the eBay auction site on the Internet gives courts throughout the country authority to hear a case against a seller who does not live in the state where a lawsuit is filed (Boschetto v. [read post]
