Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 3,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm
" She was outraged.I'm not outraged by Continental's latest procedural move because I'm merely watching its "antitrust case" against the Avanci patent pool firm and some of its licensors (Nokia, Sharp, Optis). [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:55 am
That’s how we felt when we read the recent opinion in Boudreaux v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm
Rohini Kurup explained the background and procedural history of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
This point was highlighted in a recent case, Sharp v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:55 pm
In sharp and disturbing contrast, the federal government – through one of its biggest agencies, the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
" IAM also credited OPPO for cutting "far-sighted deals" with the likes of Sharp, NTT Docomo, and Sisvel (sometimes with and sometimes without litigation).IAM's praise for OPPO's IP team makes sense. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:13 am
Last summer, the need to further turn our attention to the states was thrown into sharp relief following the Supreme Court’s egregious decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:13 am
Hughes General Contractors v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:30 am
But, as the Supreme Court recognized in a landmark 1964 decision, New York Times Company v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
By this time the case was called Chevron v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am
It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:53 am
Otherwise, companies would be reluctant to give up their right to enter into individual license agreements for various reasons, one of which is the ability to enter into full-portfolio cross-license agreements.Avanci generally calls itself a platform, but on LinkedIn, Eric Stasik was surprised to see that even Avanci's lawyers, in the Continental v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:05 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:30 pm
The longstanding dispute over the use of the MERCK trade mark around the world is set to continue for the foreseeable future as the Court of Appeal of England and Wales remitted various issues back to the High Court in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1834. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:44 pm
Justice Jenkins considered this issue in the recent case of Polischuk Estate v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 12:52 pm
The question in Robers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:25 pm
Forbidden Warrior.Forbidden expert.Bad films make good law.United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm
Though this change appears to be part of PACER’s attempt to join the 21st Century—the removal is part of PACER’s migration to its NextGen system, which is incompatible with the decades-old legacy systems holding these records—it stands in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgement in Nixon v. [read post]
