Search for: "State v House" Results 1561 - 1580 of 28,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
A group of book sellers and publishers filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against Texas officials to block House Bill (HB) 900, the state’s new book ratings law. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Unknown
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Under the bill, even where the issuer of an ancillary asset “engaged in entrepreneurial or managerial efforts that primarily determined the value” of the token — which, under the test established by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V argues that bad data should be conceptualized under broader critiques of racialized, algorithmic injustice and offers solutions for better regulating and using criminal records. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am by Will Baude
And this is not, as Baude argues, "the same case as Maine v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
 For that reason, the Court has often stood with the least popular in our society and, since Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:10 am by Giles Peaker
Wilson v Wilson & Anor (2023) EW Misc 5 (CC) A county court judgment on a claim under section 27 Housing Act 1988 for unlawful deprivation of occupation, against a background of breakdown in relations between a family. [read post]