Search for: "State v. Brook" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am by admin
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Jillian Moss
HHS announced that the proposed rule would align the Act’s protections with the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
In this week’s Foreign Policy Essay, Brookings scholars Bruce Jones and Tom Wright address the current state of international order. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Court, however, in a 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am by Brian A. Comer
Hinson, Executive Director United States Consumer Product Safety DivisionWashington, D.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
,SwitzerlandSwitzerland to introduce regulation for patent attorneys: (BLOG@IP::JUR)United Kingdom2007 Annual IP Crime Report released by UK-IPO: (BLOG@IP::JUR), (IAM)Patents Act 2004 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007 has been published in order to put in place the final batch of changes to the UK Patents Act 1977 made by the Patents Act 2004: (IPKat)United StatesUnited States Supreme Court to clarify patent exhaustion doctrine in… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
This willingness of states and other public organs to delegate is especially potent with respect to rules states are unwilling or incapable of adopting through traditional assertions of public authority. [read post]