Search for: "State v. Dallas"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Last week the United States District Court Northern District of Texas granted Target summary judgment in Sandoval v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 3:25 pm
Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Topics this month include:Top StoriesUS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:05 am
—Dallas 2015, pet. denied). [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:21 am
And in Texas, arrests based upon illegal computer use can be based upon violations of either federal or state laws defining cybercrimes, computer crimes, and internet crimes. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
Berger v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
After all, City inspector had given the road a passing grade of "C".City of Dallas v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
” For the Deseret News, Kelsey Dallas highlights the amicus briefs filed in support of the baker who declined to create a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
City of Dallas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 6:48 am
The style of the case is, Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 8:59 pm
" State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
In Conradt v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
The record [in the suit he later filed] contains affidavits from female students stating they informed Bell of this misconduct by Wildmon and Rainey. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
