Search for: "State v. David"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 12,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 7:18 pm
“Supreme Court skeptical of FBI’s claim in monitoring of Orange County Muslims”: David G. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
David A. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:46 pm
Over 20 years ago, the Washington State Supreme Court held in Nast v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
In 1972, in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:30 pm
An excerpt: Plaintiffs‐Appellants, the Cayuga Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe, and individual officers, employees, and representatives of the Cayuga Nation, filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (David N. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 8:35 am
Here are the briefs(PDF) in the matter of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
In the year 2000, grandparent visitation became much more difficult to obtain as a result of the United States Supreme Court case of Troxel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 1:36 pm
He cites as an example the recent Court of Appeal decision in Axis Surplus v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:12 pm
On February 17, 2021, the district court issued a new order in the continuing saga of United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:07 am
* David Boies thinks the Supreme Court doesn't want a Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
The Court also issued an opinion in Voisine v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:44 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer General… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
David S. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
