Search for: "State v. District Court (Brown)" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Cicely Wilson
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.Read More: Nine-Year Sentence of Terrorist Suspect Upheld by Circuit Brownstein v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
The petition for rehearing en banc filed by Democratic AGs from 16 states and the District of Columbia was denied as were the motions for reconsideration en banc filed by Senator Sherrod Brown and Representative Maxine Waters and by Americans for Financial Reform, Center for Responsible Lending, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, United States Public Interest Research Group, Maeve Brown (who chairs the CFPB’s Consumer Advisory… [read post]
  Relying on the fact that the Supreme Court “left open” the question of whether the Eighth Amendment applied to non-intervened qui tams in Austin and Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vermont, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
In that 1958 decision, the Court held that Arkansas officials resisting school desegregation must comply with federal district court orders based upon Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:10 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Ohio – Eleventh District, Portage County: State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Dist., 241 F.Supp.2d 111, 121 (D.N.H.2003)) (affirming, for the same reasons, the district court's rejection of a hybrid-rights claim because the free exercise claim was not conjoined with an independently viable companion claim); Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Dist., 241 F.Supp.2d 111, 121 (D.N.H.2003)) (affirming, for the same reasons, the district court's rejection of a hybrid-rights claim because the free exercise claim was not conjoined with an independently viable companion claim); Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court should step in to protect freedom of association against California’s push to obtain donor identities for controversial groups [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]