Search for: "State v. Grays" Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 5:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Dallas lawyer Peter Vogel of Gardere Wynne Sewell on his Vogel Internet, Information Technology and e-Discovery Blog Bank Failures: A State-by-State Affair - Ohio attorney Kevin LaCroix of OakBridge Insurance Services in his blog, The D & O Diary When a Promise Is Not a Promise in College Athletics - Los Angeles lawyer Jeffrey Kravitz of Fox Rothschild on the firm's Sports Law Scoreboard [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
  The latter finding breaks from previous case law in the Garden State, which in 2001 found in Gray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
This secondary market, so to speak, is known as the "gray market". [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
   Another case brought by Ms Kaschke was dealt with by Stadlen J on 29 March 2010, Kaschke v Gray [2010] EWHC 690 (QB) The case of Baturina v Times Newspapers (see the decision of Eady J [2010] EWHC  696 (QB)) is the subject of a comment on the Hold the Front Page website by Nigel Hanson of solicitors Foot Anstey. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
” The shinning moment Tuesday in an otherwise gray and rainy day occurred outside the courthouse, not inside. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Scott Wolfe Jr
Most of the stuff is black & white…but in some cases, there can be a little gray. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm by Jed
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari review of Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:19 am by Howard Knopf
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari (i.e. it will hear the appeal) in the case of 08-1423 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION V. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Simon Fodden
A recent judgment of the England and Wales High Court, Kaschke v Gray & Anor [2010] EWHC 690 (QB), dealt with a potential libel that occurred in a post on a blog, Labourhome.org, that opens its facilities to “Labour grassroots” to “discuss the issues important to them. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
In the Courts Kaschke v Gray [2010] EWHC 690 (QB) – is listed as a “recent judgment” but we have not discussed the case. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Following this, Professor Marshall Leaffer (Indiana Uni Maurer School of Law) was up next, tackling the grey (or gray) market; this, he observed, seems to be an insoluble problem. [read post]