Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 7,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the equivalent state level agencies. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
– UN Observer Bewails)The development of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights by John Ruggie and his team now serves as one of the most influential. templates for developing normative and framework structures for embedding human rights--and for privileging the interests of human rights holders--in many aspects of human activity within and among states. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
As regards the second question, the Court imposed a duty of efficient enforcement of private copying levies schemes to Member states in order to guarantee that the reward of the right holders will effectively take place. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:58 am
Supreme Court Punts on Costco First Sale Copyright CaseUnited States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 10:00 pm
(“UCANN”) v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:14 pm
Merriman of her right to a fair trial.To read the majority opinion in State of Tennessee v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
Holder, No. 10-1211. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
The decision, Tyler v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
United States - concerning the Armed Career Criminal Act and state convictions for batteryBloate v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
” Holder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:03 pm
District Court in Portland, Oregon, in Doe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
In Wandry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:03 pm
The recent Court of Appeals case, People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:31 am
Any provisions which limit the rights granted to the design holder must be interpreted strictly. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am
It was held that the previous judge was correct in stating that dishonesty could not properly be alleged by adding the knowledge of one innocent person to another (citing Armstrong v Strain [1952] 1 K.B 232 and Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch)). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:29 am
Holder, 2009 Westlaw 1058053 (10th Cir., April 21, 2009). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
" Such an affidavit may state that the mortgagee either held the note or acted on behalf of the note holder at the time of the foreclosure sale. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
A more recent decision on FRAND royalty calculation is Ericsson Inc v D-Link Sys., Inc 773 F. 3d 1201 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
(Special Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
