Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
In 2013, in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
See Aro Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:17 pm
State Protection for a Federal Crime Although some states have legalized (in whole or part) the sale and distribution of cannabis, such activities remain illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act[3] (as well as under many state laws). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The case is a good reminder to PGI holders to limit their protection to what matters; the stamp of regional quality for the product. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The case is a good reminder to PGI holders to limit their protection to what matters; the stamp of regional quality for the product. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The case is a good reminder to PGI holders to limit their protection to what matters; the stamp of regional quality for the product. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The case is a good reminder to PGI holders to limit their protection to what matters; the stamp of regional quality for the product. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
It noted that as the Fourth Circuit stated in Miller v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
Lee, 329 F.3d 330, 333 (3d Cir. 2003); see also Holder v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:22 am
Cir. 2019) This is an important case for anyone arguing secondary indicia — not a good case for patent holders. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am
V. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:52 am
[2] The definitive fairness test was set out in the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada case, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Holder decision and allow the federal government intervene when states pass voter suppression laws. [read post]
