Search for: "State v. Law" Results 1561 - 1580 of 157,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:37 am by becassidy
EngagedScholarship includes C|M|LAW faculty publications; articles from the Cleveland State Law Review, the Journal of Law & Health, and the Global Business Law Review; historic law school publications; and special collections such as The Sam Sheppard Cases and Terry v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:27 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Elonis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:46 am by Howard Wasserman
The purported "no dictating outcomes" principle of United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:01 am by sally
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39 “A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making… [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
It's not too late to register for the State Bar's 20th Annual Golden State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Institute, which will take place this Thursday, October 21, 2010 at the Westin St. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am by INFORRM
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of  R(C) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm by Zachary Spilman
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:32 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Moritz College of Law) has posted The Missed Opportunities of Riley v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:41 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Caren Myers Morrison (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The State Courts Don't Have Time For Your Crackpot Antiquarianism: A Decade of Domestic Homicides Since Giles v. [read post]