Search for: "State v. Leake" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has more information on the leak here. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm by Kelly
s digital lock rules (Michael Geist) ‘When copyright Bill C-32 passes, I will automatically become a criminal’ – digital locks (Michael Geist) Business method patents: The state of the art after the Amazon.com decision (IP Osgoode) Chile Heroic victory for action figures – dispute over transformers.cl (IP tango) Europe CJEU considers ‘logistical hub’ for fakes in Nokia hearing: C-495/09 (Class 46) (IPKat) (Afro-IP) EFF calls on European Commission to… [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
LEXIS 38 (Iowa May 7, 2010). http://tinyurl.com/22r6q4y Mainfreight United States Partnership v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
- Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
The New York Times reveals that recently leaked audio recordings show that the United Arab Emirates gave the Egyptian Defense Ministry money in support of protests against ousted President Mohamed Morsi in June 2013. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prince rejects fair use when his stated intent was to have fun. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am by David Kris
California, which required a warrant to search a smart phone incident to an arrest; and second, the concurrences of five Justices in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:12 pm by Bradley P. Moss
The Supreme Court infamously ruled in Dep’t of Navy v. [read post]