Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 1561 - 1580
of 29,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
In a recent case entitled People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Circuit heard oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm
They filed a lawsuit, lost at the trial level and won in the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
22 May 2015, 11:36 am
Menghini v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 11:44 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 am
Ohio et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
Adler v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:47 pm
In Pabon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:32 am
Doing so requires more than base-level knowledge of state and federal labor law. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 10:07 am
In Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:43 am
At some point a Thales v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Id. at 26-27 (emphasis added) (citing Klein v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Id. at 26-27 (emphasis added) (citing Klein v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am
In Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4, Burton J had set out the constituent elements of a “protected belief” under section 10 at [24]: the belief must be honestly held, it must be a belief as distinct from an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available, it must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour, it must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance and must… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:52 pm
Starski, A Call for a Turn to the Meta-Level of International Law: Silence, the “Interregnum”, and the Conundrum of Ius Cogens C. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
Here is an Emporia Gazette article reporting that the state dismissed attempted intentional second-degree murder charges in State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
To avoid this level of entanglement with state fiscal authority, Treasury should adopt narrower rules defining circumstances in which Fiscal Recovery Funds are deemed to be used to backfill state spending reductions. [read post]
