Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1561 - 1580 of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Most media reports and early commentary on Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Holland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
However, fun is limited to the first 119 paragraphs, as the last one inevitably states that the GC 'dismisses the action'.The contested Community trade mark In 2001, on application by Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Lisa Ramsey
Although Tam quotes the statutory provision in the federal trademark law that states that merely descriptive marks cannot be registered as trademarks, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Since internal use of a mark as a keyword isn’t use of a mark in a trademark sense, and since Radiancy didn’t place the mark on any goods, displays, etc. or use the mark in any way that indicated source or origin, Viatek didn’t state a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by David Ardia
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:05 am by Paul Horwitz
 Here's the abstract: This Article was written for a symposium held at the University of Georgia School of Law marking the fiftieth anniversary of New York Times v. [read post]