Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 19,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2023, 4:59 am
The form states: "If the asserted mark is not the subject of a U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:45 am
Crombie, et al. marked a victory for states in their battle with the automotive industry, seeking imposition of new rules to reduce tailpipe emissions. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:13 am
Miss World Limited v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 3:42 am
Clear Choice Holdings LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 pm
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
Mark V. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:28 am
By Mark V. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:49 am
Ceglia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
Gulfstream Aerospace sent up one of their $50M business jets today on an 8.5-hour test flight spanning 11 states for the sole purpose of leaving their mark on the Net in the form of a flight track that spells out 'GV' (the nickname of the Gulfstream V aircraft being flown) when viewed online. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Dino v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:13 am
Mark Dayton v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 3:54 am
Some enlightenment is needed, since they mean “Studio Ghibli” in Japanese.As regard the figurative element of the contested EUTM, the Division Opposition rejected the argument stating that it is “a well-known, unusual and highly distinctive cartoon character named ‘Totoro’”. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
In class 43, the following three trade marks were the first ones filed by Hunan Chayue: The verbal elements of the three respective trade marks (‘TM Bs’) all have only one character that differs from the TM A:TM A: ‘茶 (tea) 颜 (face) 观 (observe) 色 (colour)’ v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Although the tires include markings required by the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
However, fun is limited to the first 119 paragraphs, as the last one inevitably states that the GC 'dismisses the action'.The contested Community trade mark In 2001, on application by Mr. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm
” Nkanginieme v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm
” Nkanginieme v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
Speical App. 2010)) all marked taxpayer losses. [read post]
