Search for: "State v. Ore"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:56 pm
In Pixion, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
Kitzhaber, MD, Governor of the State of Oregon, hereby grant Gary D. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
Asha Kapoor v. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 12:25 am
Ltd. and Anil Kapoor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:49 am
Bentz, 2007 Ore. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:18 pm
" (State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:12 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:52 am
State Sugar Corporation Ltd v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm
Público – Comunicação Social, SA & Ors v Portugal (App No. 39324/07) 7 Dec 2010. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD; the Court ruled by a 4-1 majority that the executive’s decision to bar Mrs Rajavi’s admission into the UK on grounds that it would not be conducive to the public good was rational and Secretary of State had not underrated the appellants’ ECHR, art 10 rights or overstated the risk. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Background The appeal in R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors [2019] UKSC 22, concerned primarily the issue of whether the High Court has jurisdiction to judicially review decisions of the IPT, despite the apparent exclusion of such jurisdiction by way of section 67(8) of RIPA. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm
Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko & Ors v Bosnia and Herzegovina (App No. 17224/11)[2015] ECHR 873, Judgment of 13 October 2015. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
In Oregon, at least on Trimet, speak softly and carry a big message.The case referred to in the Thursday, April 24, 2008, Oregonian story by John Snell:"TriMet: You shout, you're out: New rules - It's not what you say, but how loudly you say it, that will get you booted off the public transit system," can be found at the Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) Opinions webpage.The case is: STATE OF OREGON v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:23 pm
In Ablynx NV and Anor v VHsquared Limited and Ors [2019] EWHC 792 (Pat), His Honour Justice Hacon (sitting as a High Court judge) has provided a useful judgment concerning the application of the Brussels Regulation to patent disputes where there is also a purported choice of jurisdiction by contract. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers… [read post]
