Search for: "State v. Pass "
Results 1561 - 1580
of 25,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2007, 6:59 am
Blog contributor Lauren Weldon and a few friends attended a Federalist Society debate titled, "Can Originalists Defend Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
In Richi v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:07 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:40 pm
And the speech at issue in the case, Morse v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:45 pm
In Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:03 pm
He worked at the State Department as well as Paul, Weiss and he assisted Thurgood Marshall in preparing both briefs and oral argument in Brown v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
Allen v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
And in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
In response, the city passed a zoning ordinance that not only precluded the use of the homes for that purpose but effectively banned the ministry from the city. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Accordingly, a successful claim for passing off was established, and the defendant’s registration for the word mark BOCA BISTRO CAFÉ was held to be invalid. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:27 am
Why pass up the opprotunity to frame the issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Assn. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:02 am
(As we explained here, AB 5 codified and expanded the controversial “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
” In an 1888 case called Banks v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:54 pm
For example, Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Association v. [read post]
