Search for: "State v. Texas City"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,877
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
Breyer and the majority cited a previous Supreme Court decision, Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
” After Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm
Hill Country Estates Homeowner’s Association v Guernsey, 2015 WL 2160510 (TX App. 5/7/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/texas/thirteenth-court-of-appeals/2015/13-13-00395-cv.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Enforcement [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:13 am
The issue was then settled, at least in the Supreme Court, in the controversial Texas v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
University of Texas at Austin, 14-981 (the affirmative action case), and Currier v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:57 am
This case, Jackson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:55 am
The style of this case is, American Alternative Insurance v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The Court heard nine cases during the March session when Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:53 pm
With the thorny Jerusalem passports issue finally out of the way, many Court watchers expect the next high-profile decision to come in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
City State Bank of Palacios, 44 S.W.3d 121, 139 (Tex. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
(stating same); Friberg-Cooper Water Supply Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Texas. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:49 am
The Supreme Court of Texas sums it up in City of Houston v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
Abbott, the Texas “one person, one vote” case, continues to garner commentary. [read post]
31 May 2015, 6:34 am
It is styled, Jaw The Point, L.L.C. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
Members of the public observed that it was public money that was building this goldmine of a library in the middle of the city, so why shouldn’t they have access, too? [read post]
