Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION" Results 1561 - 1580 of 23,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 7:42 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Contact one of our skilled trial attorneys by calling Schwartzapfel Lawyers at 1-516-342-2200 today! [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:40 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Note, too, that if your case goes to trial, there may be additional court fees that must be paid. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
In the not-so-distant past, we represented a family business organized as multiple separate entities operating in multiple states under a single administrative structure. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:32 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
Trial Attorneys Lauren Archer and Christina McGill of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section prosecuted the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am by Josh Blackman
But while it is certainly true that indirect injuries may be harder to prove, an indirect financial injury that is proved at trial supports standing. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:43 am by SHG
The Connecticut Supreme Court “got it. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
 The move reverses a Trump administration policy from late 2020. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As mentioned above, Fancourt J continued to hear the trial of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
The court in Ogilvie thus affirmed the continued relevance of vocational evidence with respect to the determination of permanent disability. ( Applied Materials v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Josh Blackman
The trial court found that Texas had standing, and vacated the policy. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:25 am by Jon Katz
Appellate courts look at whether lower reviewed courts have exercised sound discretion in limiting how long each part of the trial -- and the entire trial -- lasts. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:55 pm by Larry
That means no new evidence, no discovery, no witnesses, and no trial. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:05 am by Eugene Volokh
" But the federal District Court threw out the claims, "concluding that the disciplinary proceedings were quasi-judicial in nature and that D, therefore, enjoyed absolute immunity under Connecticut law for any statements that she had made in the course of those proceedings" (much like witnesses in trials have such immunity from civil lawsuits). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The agreement caps an investigation that was opened in 2018 during the Trump administration and has generated interest and criticism from Republican politicians who accused the Biden administration of reluctance to pursue the case. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott McKeown
Provides for Director review of PTAB decisions by adopting the structure the Supreme Court suggested in Arthrex to fix the appointments of the Administrative Patent Judges under the Appointments clause and requires the Director to issue a separate written opinion when rehearing a PTAB decision. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott McKeown
Provides for Director review of PTAB decisions by adopting the structure the Supreme Court suggested in Arthrex to fix the appointments of the Administrative Patent Judges under the Appointments clause and requires the Director to issue a separate written opinion when rehearing a PTAB decision. [read post]