Search for: "Terrible v. Terrible" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 5:32 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court issues its long-awaited decision in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:39 pm
[v]iolate any provision [of this section or] [b]e on duty or operate a commercial motor vehicle if, by the driver’s general appearance or conduct or by other substantiating evidence, the driver appears to have used alcohol within the preceding 4 hours. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
They understand them in their ‘bones’ so to say, and they’ve realised for many years the terrible complexity of deciding on how such claims would be infringed, as Mr Justice Arnold has discovered. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Security research continued, opponents Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan Smith Cy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Opponents:Christian Troncoso, BSA | The Software Alliance: we support good faith security testing. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
.Something terrible needs to have happenedfor a Petition for Review to succeedThe Enlarged Board of the EPO decides on referrals from the Boards of Appeal on important points of law. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:00 am by JB
  JB: Reading your book, I was reminded of my colleague Sandy Levinson, who thinks that founder worship and constitutional veneration are a terrible idea and that we should junk the Constitution and start over. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:24 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The commute to Philadelphia wasn’t terrible but it also wasn’t something that I planned on doing for years to come. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has posted the video of last Monday's oral argument in Paul Hansmeier, Esq. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Minor accomplices who neither kill nor intend to kill are protected by a federal constitutional rule, Enmund v. [read post]