Search for: "United States Solicitor General" Results 1561 - 1580 of 4,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 2:44 am by Michael DelSignore
Solicitor General to argue why the Supreme Court should not hold that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law cannot support reasonable suspicion. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
  Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, as amicus supporting petitioners for the United States and the Secretary of Labor, and Paul Clement, Bancroft Associates, for respondents, faced the brunt of these issues. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:31 am by Rani Gupta - Guest
Assistant to the Solicitor General Matthew Roberts argued on behalf of the United States, which urged the court to vacate the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and remand the case for that court to consider whether – in light of Tapia’s failure to object to the sentence at sentencing – the district court’s decision constituted plain error warranting reversal. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
William Jay argued on behalf of the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, supporting Ms. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
For now, we know that the Solicitor General has argued that the federal government can force the Little Sisters to pay for medical services regarding abortion even though the United States government does not pay for these services. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler quickly met questions from Justice Sotomayor regarding what kind of scrutiny was appropriate for the residency requirement. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:13 am by Kali Borkoski
Moderator,  Edwin Meese III, Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow, The Heritage Foundation Neal Katyal, former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Ronald Rotunda, Doy & Dee Henley Chair and Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, Chapman University School of Law Victor Schwartz, Partner, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP and former Dean, University of Cincinnati College of Law Panel II (11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.) [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, No. 11-1395 (pending a response from the Solicitor General (due September 12)) This week at CAAF: CAAF is in its summer recess and is not scheduled to hear oral arguments until October. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) I tend to agree with Eugene that today’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
 We argued recently that this expansion is in error and should be eliminated as an improper destabilization of settled res judicata principles.[1] In a recent amicus filing, the United States Solicitor General agreed that the Federal Circuit’s precedent is in error.[2]  Despite that core agreement, the SG brief is rife with misleading guidance. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Article on the Interaction of Choice of Law Rules and the Australian Constitution Christopher Kourakis, the Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia,... [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 9:29 am by brian
United States, will not only be the Court's second politically-charged blockbuster in as many months, but also a rematch between the Solicitor General Donald Verrilli and D.C. superlawyer Paul Clement. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:04 pm by Erin Miller
The Solicitor General then files a brief in the case expressing the views of the United States government. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:15 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
In June 2014, United Kingdom researchers Anne Barlow, Rosemary Hunter, Janet Smithson, and Jan Ewing published a research paper titled Mapping Paths to Family Justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:16 am by Heather Whiteman Runs Him
  Arguing for the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Erica Ross opened her argument by citing the court’s long-established analysis of the ultimate source of sovereignty applied in double jeopardy cases. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
  On August 27, 1994, the Lipsons signed a letter addressed to their solicitor stating that the Bank of Montreal was lending them $562,500 on September 1, 1994 to place a mortgage on the new property. [read post]