Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 11:51 am
Accretive LLC, United States District Court, Central District of California A press release from the law firm filing the complaint: New York, NY — September 15, 2009 — The law firm of Milberg LLP has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of all persons who used NAF's arbitration services during the period from June 1, 2006 to the present, inclusive… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
That is the question that will now be asked of juries as a result of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal also found that numerous business entities had made filings with the California Secretary of State. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In two published decisions the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied class certification in putative class actions brought by current and former users of the prescription drug Paxil against GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The Court then explained: The United States Supreme Court, however, in Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 4:21 am
United States, in 2018). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
United States v Windsor challenges the denial of federal benefits for gay couples under the Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].As many as 17 states have filed amicus briefs in opposition to gay marriage. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:52 am
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Administrative Procedures Act) Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm
For instance, the burden onPapst is mitigated by Papst’s status as a non-practicingpatent holder residing outside the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
United States In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 10:43 am
Under California law, and the common law throughout the United States, when someone is injured as a result of the negligence of others they are entitled to recover as damages the reasonable amount of their medical bills, in addition to other damages such as pain and suffering, lost earnings, loss of earning capacity etc. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 1:06 am
This week the California Supreme Court, in People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:56 am
This is the far more sensible rule and is more consistent with California's policy towards non-compete and trade secrets claims. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of CaliforniaOpinion Date: 10/21/11Cite: Amron Int'l Diving Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
