Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 1561 - 1580 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am by Jesse Tyner Moore
Watkins joins from the Office of the Arizona Attorney General, where he has overseen Arizona’s “regulatory sandbox” fintech initiative, the first of its kind in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by David Kris
United States—not just Chief Justice John Roberts’s majority opinion but also Justice Anthony Kennedy’s dissent—reinforce the point. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Is the activity in question a “core”, “central” or “basic” function of the institution? [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Knowing what you know now about the United States’s use of waterboarding and other coercive methods against detainees, do you still believe that the United States did not torture? [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:45 pm
She had crossed into the United States the month before and discovered she was pregnant soon after. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by Amy Howe
For example, in 1981 President Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor, who would later vote to reaffirm the core holding of Roe. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm by James Yang
Risks based on first inventor to file rule With the enactment of the America Invents Act (AIA), the United States went to a first inventor to file rule. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Mincing no words in her dissent, in which Justice Kagan joined, Justice Sotomayor wrote: “The United States of America is a Nation built upon the promise of religious liberty. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES William E. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm by David Kopel
The prohibition was acknowledged to be the broadest in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:38 pm by Andrew Hamm
Hawaii, which rejected a challenge to the Trump administration’s September 2017 proclamation restricting entry into the United States by nationals of eight countries; she writes that “[t]o support its Establishment Clause analysis, the Court relied on core equal protection precedent and, in the process, seems to have announced a new equal protection rule regarding when the presence of government animus will invalidate government action. [read post]