Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 6,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am
Shultz Former Secretary of State General Michael V. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
BLOMQUIST v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence
Recording of Punjabi Conversation Found Intelligible By Hearing Court Is Admissible as Evidence
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
Armed Forces, who have dedicated their careers to exemplary legal and military services for the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
It also is an appeal that would be made by the United States over the invalidation of a federal statute. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:00 pm
Chief Justice Warren Burger similarly noted in United Jewish Organizations v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
United States, 529 U.S. 334, 338 (2000)).Montgomery v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:41 am
United States is whether identity theft occurs anytime a person uses someone else’s name in the commission of a crime. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
David W. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:38 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2013), the defendant was taken into custody under suspicion of having robbed an elderly woman. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:33 pm
Most of these cases were filed in various state and federal courts throughout the United States by individual contact lens-wearers who suffered eye infections after using the defective ReNu with MoistureLoc product. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
