Search for: "United States v. Green"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
(IPKat) Next lap in Force India vs Ethiad dispute (IPKat) United States US General US election brings IP uncertainty (IP Watch) US Patent Reform Patent Reform still on the table (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents Bond’s gun a hit at the USPTO (IPKat) Regional patent office coming to a city near you? [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:12 pm
Following this in-depth process, the European Commission requested the green light on the adequacy decisions from Member States’ representatives in the so-called comitology procedure. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
There was also the now resolved Green v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Greene’s Energy Group and Lucia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
Many US soldiers were appalled by the rampant torture of dogs and puppies they witnessed while being based with ANSF units. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
Many US soldiers were appalled by the rampant torture of dogs and puppies they witnessed while being based with ANSF units. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:41 am
” In addition, the sole justification provided by the administration for acting against Khalil is a single line in the Notice to Appear in immigration court: “The Secretary of State has determined that your presence or activities in the United States would have serious adverse policy consequences for the foreign policy of the United States,” citing 237(A)(4)(c)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 1:33 pm
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
Vermillion and the City appeal, arguing that the superior court erred because article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution and the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution protect the requested documents.West v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
Baines v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 10:35 pm
Green Valley Investments, LLC v Winnebago County, 2015 WL 4509767 (7th Cir. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:31 am
That changed on October 26, 2006, when the Florida Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Green was relevant. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:48 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
The United States is unique among developed nations in relying on case-by-case court decisions to develop its competition policy. [read post]
