Search for: "United States v. Hill"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
Let me suggest, however, that the Department of Justice, and then the United States Supreme Court, explicitly refused to place the CRA into a genuinely transformative framework. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:40 pm
And the Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm
Rock, of Boston, as a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:09 pm
; see also Hill v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:46 pm
” Hill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
In Hill v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
United States.] [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:26 am
In Mathews v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Faced with the continuing rise of Nazi power, Clara sent her two daughters [*4] to the United States after Gustav's death. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:30 am
This point recently came before Judge Birss QC in the (still misnamed) Patents County Court for England and Wales in relation to whether a substantial part of a book was reproduced in a film script: Hodgson and Jarvie v Isaac and Notting Hill Movies Ltd (2011). [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
McCain’s views may matter especially to Hillary Clinton supporters, many of whom are pro-choice; according to syndicated columnist Froma Harrop, “[T]hey’ll want to know this: Would McCain stock the Supreme Court with foes of Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:18 pm
Additional Resources: It’s time for action on Social Security disability insurance, May 6, 2016, The Hill, By Jim McCrery and Earl Pomeroy More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
” The Hernandez family’s case implicates foreign relations, the court reasoned, because of the “legitimate and important interests” of both the United States and Mexico “that may be affected by the way in which this matter is handled. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
" As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
SCOTT KAVALEK, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 08-2646-NLH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
