Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm by Erin Miller
  Justice Stevens wrote a concurrence in this Term’s case, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the case, which will be argued on Wednesday, “could go a long way toward reversing abortion rights in the United States[:] Whether they ultimately revert by four years or 47 remains to be seen. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
One example of a negligent hiring claim is shown in a recent case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the federal appellate court in which Louisiana sits). [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who argued on behalf of the United States as a “friend of the court” supporting Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Further, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that "state laws that conflict with federal law are 'without effect.' " Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:55 am by Eugene Volokh
For an example of this, see the animal cruelty video case from a few years ago, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 12:19 pm by Steven Cohen
Stone Oil Distributors, LLC – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – October 16th, 2019) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
Yaser Esam Hamdi had been born in Louisiana, and thus had a plausible claim to citizenship as well. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 10:41 am by Will Baude
United States (2007), where a sympathetic drug dealer finally gets a break in a sentencing opinion. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]