Search for: "V D" Results 1561 - 1580 of 76,323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
I'd be surprised if other state supreme courts would readily go the other way and find the underlying distinction unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:59 am by Thorin Klosowski
The NSA has a long history of spying on Americans, but we hadn't gotten to Jewel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
Use of a trade mark as a trade or company name or part thereof (Art. 10(3)(d) TMD/Art. 9(3)(d) EUTMR) as such has been found not to be trade mark infringing as it does not constitute use ‘in relation to goods or services’ (CJEU, Céline, case C-17/06, IPKat here). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Administrator
… The CourtAPPEAL WATCH: Pepa v Canada, bound by obiter The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) granted leave to appeal Pepa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FCA 102 (“Pepa FCA”), a pithy (16 paragraph) dismissal of a certified question for appeal from the Federal Court of Canada (“FC”) under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. v LeGard, 3:23-CV-266 (D Conn Feb. 16, 2024) is the latest. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 2:18 pm
Pix credit here (Learning Map/Study Guide)Chinese Leninist theory as it has developed during the leadership of Xi Jinping has proven to be a dynamic process. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
Hickmet and Cheerz Express Limited v Dragos (Luton County Court, 19 January 2024) Ms Dragos was the assured shorthold tenant of Cheerz Express, with the tenancy beginning 1 June 2017. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am by Russell Knight
“[D]isclosure of matter obtained by discovery is not conclusive but may be contradicted” Trapkus v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by SOQUIJ
Cependant, le dispositif du jugement de la Cour supérieure doit être maintenu puisque, en appliquant au jugement de première instance la norme plus sévère de la décision correcte, le même résultat s’impose en l’espèce. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Theresa-Marie Shaw (University of Queensland), Patentability – Impacts of Biotechnology following Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics (2024): In Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics Inc ‘Myriad’ and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc... [read post]