Search for: "WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS" Results 1561 - 1580 of 4,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Adam Schwartz
In 2013, the federal trial court preliminarily enjoined the law, and in 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that ruling. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:43 am by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:27 am by 802050david
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am by Ron Coleman
 The trial court dismissed everyone’s claims on summary judgment, up it went to the Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:35 am by Peter Breslauer
District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin denied on April 1, 2016. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:35 am by Peter Breslauer
District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin denied on April 1, 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
He ordered the recount to commence.This ruling was appealed in real time to the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals which upheld Judge Goldsmith's initial injunction, but commented that it would expect the lower court to entertain properly filed motions once the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequently addressed the state voting law issues.The Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that Stein could not demonstrate that… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:10 pm by Bill Marler
Today the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the December 15, 2015, District Court dismissal of a lawsuit brought by tomato grower, Seaside Farm, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:49 am by Tamar N. Dolcourt
On November 30, 2016, all of the judges of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin) reheard a case that could change the way federal courts treat sexual orientation-based discrimination claims. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
" After much litigation over that original language, the Legislature amended this statutory language as a direct reaction to a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision that, in the Legislature's view, was contrary to the purpose of the original statute implemented as part of 2011 Act 32. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
" After much litigation over that original language, the Legislature amended this statutory language as a direct reaction to a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision that, in the Legislature's view, was contrary to the purpose of the original statute implemented as part of 2011 Act 32. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:15 pm by Gary Neustadter
Sticka (In re Applebaum) (BAP 9th Cir. 2009) (Judge Markell dissenting), as have the Fourth and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeal.) [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
Barry Donohoo appealed the grant of summary judgment against his claim that local officials in Douglas County, Wisconsin, violated his constitutional rights when they denied him the land use permit. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Gregory Dell
., the Federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin denied plaintiff Kathy Jacowski‘s claim that Aetna arbitrarily and capriciously terminated her long-term disability benefits in violation of ERISA. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Gregory Dell
., the Federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin denied plaintiff Kathy Jacowski‘s claim that Aetna arbitrarily and capriciously terminated her long-term disability benefits in violation of ERISA. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 11:44 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
But the class of drivers appealed that decision and the Ninth Circuit Court ruled in favor of the drivers, finding that the shipping company maintained the right to significantly dictate the way drivers carried out their jobs. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 11:44 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
But the class of drivers appealed that decision and the Ninth Circuit Court ruled in favor of the drivers, finding that the shipping company maintained the right to significantly dictate the way drivers carried out their jobs. [read post]