Search for: "Wells v. Social Security Administration" Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While the concept of irony may seem well beyond the ken of an average ten-year-old, young children routinely experiment with the seeds of satire. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Davis, upholding under the Spending Clause the payroll tax that was then and still is a part of the system of financing Social Security. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:30 pm by Attorney Leslie Gaines
 The law says that the Social Security Administration (SSA) will look to see if alcohol or drug use is a contributing factor that is material to the disabling impairment(s). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:06 am
Commissioner of Social Security Social Security Disability Benefits for Mental Impairments that Have Not Been Formally Treated - Boulis-Gasche v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
Our selfish interests In law, as in other social sciences, we do well to remind ourselves that our cooperative tendencies, such as they exist, do not derive from some drive to produce objective justice. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:33 pm
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied Plaintiff Dayna Carter's disability benefits claim, in which Carter asserted that she's unable to work due to the effects of a brain aneurism as well as severe fatigue and depression. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am by Kristine Knaplund
  Although this is a federal benefit, the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the courts generally look to state law to determine the answers to these two questions. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:27 am
Originally, the Court remanded the claim back to the administrator to properly consider the claim, including evidence supporting impairment, to include the Social Security determination and other evidence. [read post]
Lord Rodger cites McHugh and Kirby JJ (High Court of Australia, Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002 v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There are a number of resolved complaints since last week, including the Met Office v The Daily Telegraph (over the accuracy of claims about the Met’s ability to predict the weather); Richard Ottaway MP v The Daily Telegraph (clause 1, accuracy) and the British Association of Social Workers v Community Care (clause 1, accuracy). [read post]