Search for: ""duty to warn"" Results 141 - 160 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Brian
Drug manufacturers have a legal and ethical duty to warn patients about potential risks and to remove drugs from the market/not place them on the market if they are harmful. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Brian
Drug manufacturers have a legal and ethical duty to warn patients about potential risks and to remove drugs from the market/not place them on the market if they are harmful. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 6:06 am by Maurer Law
The level of duty to warn or remedy a dangerous condition that a landowner owes to you depends on the reason that you are visiting the property. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:15 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
 However, an employer or premises owner can discharge their duty to warn employees of an independent contractor by notifying the independent contractor or his supervisory employees of the latent danger. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:43 pm by Jon L. Gelman
That rebuttable heeding presumption accords with the manufacturer’s basic duty to warn and fairly reduces the victim’s burden of proof. [read post]
20 May 2020, 6:47 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
“Unless the defendant has actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition on its premises, it does not owe a duty to warn of or remove the dangerous condition. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am by Ralf Michaels
General implications of the coronavirus on product liability and a possible duty to warn costumers, without specific reverence to conflict of laws. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am by Christopher Simon
However, the owner does not have a duty to warn the invitee of the hazard if the invitee knew of the condition. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:49 am by MBettman
The issue in the … Continue reading → The post Oral Argument Preview: What is Premises Owner’s Duty to Warn or Protect Business Invitees From Criminal Activity on Premises? [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 10:31 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
A manufacturer has the duty to warn a product’s users of dangers of which the manufacturer knows or should know. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Otherwise, plaintiffs may attempt to exploit stock drops related to COVID-19 similar to other forms of event driven litigation (see Avoiding Event Driven Litigation through Good Cybersecurity Governance) by framing them as the materialization of a known but previously undisclosed risk that the company was under a duty to warn about. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:12 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The duty includes the specific responsibility of either removing, or warning the independent contractor of, any hidden or latent dangers on the property. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:00 am by Law Offices of David M. Benenfeld P.A
But if there is any reason that the owner cannot make the property entirely safe, they owe their guests the duty of warning them about any potential hazards. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 10:25 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Similarly, if talc-based products pose a danger to consumers, Johnson & Johnson has a legal duty to warn consumers of such. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 2:30 am by Jeff Margulies (US)
The amendments also revise the definition of the “actual knowledge” that creates a duty to warn for retailers in certain circumstances under the warning regulations. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 6:28 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  In Maryland, businesses such as the defendant have a duty to warn customers of known hidden dangers, a duty to inspect the premises for dangers, and a duty to take reasonable precautions against foreseeable dangers. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
Companies, including Johnson & Johnson, have a legal duty to warn consumers about the dangers posed by their products. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
On appeal, the court concluded that, even if the defendants had a duty to warn residents with something more than blocking the entrance of the parking lot, the plaintiff was aware of the danger and assumed the risk of injury. [read post]